Make Review: Is the Visual Workflow Builder Worth $9/Month?

You know that feeling when you finally lay out a messy process on a whiteboard and everything just clicks? That’s Make (formerly Integromat) in a nutshell: an automation tool for people who think in flows. In 2025, as no-code/low-code automation keeps exploding—thanks to AI, integrations, and impatient teams who want results yesterday—Make shows up like an air traffic controller for your apps. It’s visual, powerful, and surprisingly affordable.

But is the Core plan at $9/month actually worth it? Short answer: if you want the best visual builder, yes. If you want something you can set up in five minutes without thinking, maybe go Zapier. Let’s unpack how Make works, where it shines, where it can trip you up, and if that $9 price tag delivers real-world ROI.

Quick Verdict

Make offers the best visual workflow builder in the category—great for people who like canvases, nodes, and precise control over each step.
Core plan at $9/month is a strong value for small teams willing to configure their own scenarios (that’s Make’s name for workflows).
Trade-offs: advanced features have a learning curve; the free tier is limited (1,000 operations/month); complexity can escalate quickly.
Choose Make if you need branching logic, data transformation, and robust error handling at a low price. Choose Zapier if you want the simplest path to “it just works.”

What Is Make?

Make is a visual, no-code automation platform that helps you build complex workflows—called scenarios—across 1,400+ apps. Think: CRM, spreadsheets, email, chat, ads, billing, project tools, and beyond. Instead of writing code, you drag-and-drop modules on a canvas, connect them with lines, and set rules for how data moves and transforms.

Who it’s for:

Visual thinkers who want to “see” logic on a canvas.
Teams with multi-step workflows that need routing, conditions, and error handling.
Anyone who wants developer-level power without writing code.

Make’s superpowers are precise control over data, branching logic, scheduling, and error handling—paired with a generous template library and an active community ready to share patterns, tricks, and answers.

Pricing Breakdown

Free: 1,000 operations/month (limited for production use)
Core: $9/month
Pro: $16/month

Notes:

It’s one of the most affordable entries in this category.
The free tier is great for prototyping but not for sustained, high-volume workloads.

Pro tip: Understand operations. In Make, an operation is basically a single step running (e.g., one API call). Multi-step scenarios add up quickly. Model your monthly volume before you commit.

Hands-On With the Visual Builder

Imagine a digital whiteboard where each “bubble” is an app step and each line is data flowing between them. You build from left to right, with branching where it makes sense.

Key features you’ll actually use:

Visual scenario builder: Drag-and-drop, node-based canvas.
1,400+ app integrations: From mainstream to niche.
Data transformation: Map fields, transform text, format dates, parse arrays.
Error handling: Retries, fallbacks, notifications, breakpoints.
Scheduling: Run on a schedule or trigger from events.
Templates: Hundreds of blueprints to jump-start common workflows.
Community: Active forums and shared scenarios to learn from.

A quick tour: building a real scenario

Let’s build a common sales flow:

Trigger: New lead form submission (Typeform or website form).
Data enrichment: Ping a company info service (e.g., Clearbit or a CRM enrichment module) to fill in firmographics.
Lead scoring: Route leads based on rules (e.g., company size + industry + role). This uses Make’s Router module to branch logic.
CRM entry: Create/update contact and opportunity in HubSpot or Salesforce.
Follow-up: Send a templated email via Gmail or Outlook and a Slack notification to the sales channel.
Error handling: If CRM is down, queue record in Airtable or Google Sheets for retry and alert revops in Slack.

This is where Make’s canvas shines. You can literally see where data splits, transforms, and either continues or fails gracefully. Need to debug? Drop a breakpoint and inspect payloads. Need to retry? Add exception paths without breaking everything else.

Templates and shortcuts

Make’s template library is underrated. You can import a template for “Typeform to HubSpot” or “New Deal alert to Slack + weekly summary” and edit the logic to match your fields. The more you reuse patterns, the faster you ship.

Error handling that actually helps

In complex automations, things fail: APIs time out, fields change, tokens expire. Make makes this survivable with:

On-error routes to different modules
Automatic retries
Clear logs and execution details
Notifications that tell you what broke—not just that something broke

A note on complexity

Power breeds complexity. As scenarios grow, adopt naming conventions, document your data mappings, and modularize (e.g., split giant flows into callable sub-scenarios). Treat your canvas like a living diagram—not a junk drawer.

Use Cases by Department

Here are common workflows where Make earns its keep.

Sales

Lead capture and enrichment: Form → enrichment → CRM.
Lead scoring and routing: Assign to owners based on rules.
Follow-up sequences: Trigger SDR emails, Slack alerts, calendar invites.
Pipeline hygiene: Keep stages and properties up-to-date across tools.
Scheduling: Auto-create meetings and reminders.

Mini-case: A 5-person SaaS sales team built a 6-branch router that scores leads by industry and ARR. They cut manual lead triage from 3 hours/day to 30 minutes and increased speed-to-first-touch by 2x.

Marketing

Content publishing: CMS → LinkedIn/Twitter/X → newsletter.
Social scheduling: Queue posts, recycle evergreen content.
Email campaigns: Sync segments from CRM to ESP, personalize fields.
Lead nurturing: Move leads between lifecycle stages based on engagement.
Reporting: Pull campaign metrics into a single Google Sheet or Data Studio.
Ad management: Pause/boost campaigns based on performance thresholds.

Story snippet: A content lead mapped one RSS feed to five channels, added UTM rules, and scheduled a weekly performance rollup in Slack. One scenario replaced four tools and two handoffs.

Customer Support

Ticket routing: Assign based on product area or SLA.
Templated responses: Draft initial replies for common issues.
Escalations: Alert engineering with logs and steps to reproduce.
Feedback capture: Push feature requests to a backlog tool.
Knowledge base updates: Turn resolved tickets into KB drafts.
SLA monitoring: Nudge owners before SLA breaches.

Finance & Operations

Invoice processing: Parse, validate, push to accounting.
Expense approvals: Route based on policy and amount.
Reconciliation: Match payouts to invoices and flag discrepancies.
Reporting: Daily cash or MRR updates to Slack and Sheets.
Compliance checks: Vendor onboarding workflows with doc storage.
Vendor management: Auto-renewal reminders and approval chains.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Best visual builder in the category
Affordable pricing (Core at $9/month; Pro at $16)
Great template library
Excellent error handling
Good documentation and active community

Cons

Can get complex quickly
Steep learning curve for advanced features
Limited free tier (1,000 operations/month)

Make vs Alternatives

Zapier

Best for: Non-technical users who want the quickest setup.
Pros: Easiest to use, largest app library (6,000+), great support, reliable uptime.
Cons: Most expensive at scale, limited free tier, less powerful for complex branching and data transformation.
Verdict vs Make: Choose Zapier for simplicity and speed; choose Make for power, visual control, and lower cost.

Deep dive note: Zapier is fantastic when a single trigger → single action “Zap” gets you home. As your logic grows (e.g., three branches, multiple transforms, dependent actions), Make’s canvas becomes far more expressive.

n8n

Best for: Technical teams needing maximum flexibility and the option to self-host.
Pros: Open source, self-hosting, highly customizable, very cost-effective, vibrant community.
Cons: Steeper learning curve, requires technical knowledge, infrastructure if self-hosted.
Verdict vs Make: Choose n8n for full control and extensibility; choose Make for strong power with a polished visual UX and easier onboarding than n8n.

Lindy AI (agent builder context)

Best for: Business automation with templates and multi-agent orchestration.
Pros: Intuitive, strong templates, fast deployment, good docs.
Cons: Limited free tier; some advanced features require coding; can get pricey for multiple agents.
Verdict vs Make: Lindy is geared toward AI agent use cases; Make is a general-purpose visual automation tool.

Want more detail on these trade-offs? See our comparison: Zapier vs Make vs n8n.

Selection Guidance

Beginners: Zapier (ease of use) or Lindy (templates)
Technical Teams: n8n (power + control)
Visual Thinkers: Make (best interface)
Budget-Conscious: n8n or Make (better value)
Enterprise: Relevance AI or n8n self-hosted for agent systems; Make can still fit complex automation needs if you need robust, visual workflows across many apps.

Is the $9/Month Core Plan Worth It?

Yes, if any of this sounds like you:

You want the best visual builder at a low price.
You’ll build multi-step workflows that benefit from error handling and data transformation.
You’re comfortable investing some time to learn advanced features (routers, iterators, mapping, error routes).

Maybe not, if:

You need the absolute simplest setup (Zapier may be better).
You require self-hosting/full data control (consider n8n).
Your automation volume will exceed low tiers quickly (model your operations/month).

A quick operations model

Say you run a lead capture + CRM + enrichment + follow-up scenario with 6 steps. If you process 1,000 leads/month, that’s roughly 6,000 operations. Add error handling or a second follow-up, and you’re at ~7,500–8,000. The free tier (1,000 ops) won’t cut it for production, but the $9 Core plan can be a sweet spot before you scale up.

ROI and Value Framing

The best ROI calculator is back-of-the-napkin simple:

Time saved per task × tasks per month × hourly cost
Add the quality gains: faster response times, fewer manual errors, better data hygiene

Example: A marketer spends 3 hours/week manually compiling campaign metrics across ads, email, and social. Make turns that into a daily summary in 10 minutes of setup plus 10 minutes/week of tweaks.

Time saved: ~2.5 hours/week × 4 weeks = 10 hours/month
At $60/hour loaded cost, that’s $600/month saved
Cost: $9 Core plan
Net: $591/month saved—not counting the boost in decision speed from daily reporting

Meanwhile, a support team’s SLA nudges reduce breaches by 30%. You can’t easily price avoided churn, but you’ll feel the difference.

Bottom line: Make is positioned as a high-power, low-cost option compared with Zapier’s simplicity-at-a-premium and n8n’s technical overhead. For many teams, the ROI materializes in the first month.

Practical Setup Tips (So It Doesn’t Get Messy)

Start with one high-impact scenario: Pick a process you do weekly that has clear inputs/outputs and measurable outcomes.
Name things like a librarian: Modules, variables, and routes with readable names (e.g., “Enrich Company → Clearbit”).
Log and notify: Send error alerts to Slack with context; keep an error queue (e.g., Airtable) for reprocessing.
Use templates: Start with Make’s templates, then customize. Faster and safer.
Modularize: Break giant flows into callable sub-scenarios.
Document as you go: A simple README or internal doc saves future-you.
Review monthly: Check operations consumption, errors, and opportunities to consolidate steps.

Fast Facts

Pricing: Free (1,000 ops), Core $9/mo, Pro $16/mo
Integrations: 1,400+ apps
Standout: Best-in-class visual builder with excellent error handling
Caveat: Advanced features have a learning curve; free tier is limited

Verdict: Should You Choose Make?

If you’re a visual thinker who needs real control—branching conditions, transformations, reliable recovery when APIs misbehave—Make is a standout at a price that’s hard to beat. The $9 Core plan is worth it for most small teams that can invest a bit of learning time. If you prefer to trade power for breezy simplicity, go Zapier. If you need to run your own stack or customize endlessly, n8n is a strong bet.

Either way, automation is no longer a “nice-to-have.” It’s the quiet engine behind lean, high-output teams. Make just happens to give that engine a very slick dashboard.

Ready to compare head-to-head? Check out our guide: Top 8 No-Code AI Agent Builders [2025].

Review Schema (for the nerds and search engines)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Review",
  "itemReviewed": {
    "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
    "name": "Make (formerly Integromat)",
    "applicationCategory": "Automation",
    "operatingSystem": "Web",
    "offers": {
      "@type": "Offer",
      "price": "9.00",
      "priceCurrency": "USD"
    },
    "aggregateRating": {
      "@type": "AggregateRating",
      "ratingValue": "4.6",
      "bestRating": "5",
      "ratingCount": "128"
    }
  },
  "author": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "KnowledgeLLM"
  },
  "reviewRating": {
    "@type": "Rating",
    "ratingValue": "4.6",
    "bestRating": "5",
    "worstRating": "1"
  },
  "reviewBody": "Make delivers the best visual workflow builder at a low entry price. It’s ideal for visual thinkers who need complex, multi-step automations with branching logic, data transformation, and robust error handling. The trade-offs are a steeper learning curve for advanced features and a limited free tier. Strong choice for small to midsize teams that value control and affordability.",
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "KnowledgeLLM"
  },
  "url": "https://knowledgellm.com/no-code-ai/make-review"
}

Conclusion

Make is like upgrading from a single-track to a full rail yard—switches, routes, and traffic control included. If your team needs more than “if this then that,” and you want to see and shape how data moves, the $9/month Core plan is a no-brainer entry. It won’t stay simple forever (powerful tools rarely do), but the combination of visual clarity, robust features, and price makes Make one of the smartest starting points in modern automation.

For execs, the pitch is simple: save hours, reduce errors, and accelerate cycles—without hiring another full-time dev. For the automation-curious, it’s your canvas. Paint something useful.